I love-hate academia. No, wait: I love-hate academia. This is because what I study resonates within me in a way that no amount of stress or sleep-deprivation can lessen its impression on my soul.
Sometimes, in between long stretches of procrastination or escapism, I am a serious student. This is because I feel that what I study is serious, revelatory, true.
I must have looked especially dedicated during one game day when a burlesque alumnus lumbers over to my table and posits, “Law?”
I could understand why he had assumed so. I was reading from a mammoth of an anthology; Apparently it looked somber, and grave, and profound enough to speak for his profession.
Amused, I answered, “No, Lit theory.”
“Oh.”
Short. Mo-no-syl-la-bic. Possibly the quickest dismissal I have ever encountered. I was almost impressed.
I can’t say that I was particularly offended. I supposed that I should have been glad he even knew what literary theory was.
But as he walked away, his daughter clinging on to his forearm, I began to think about what it means for he who subsumes the humanities under the more objective, practical – superior – social or science fields.
I wondered how many shades of perception were veiled from his vision.
I wondered if whether he, knowing the definitional difference between “black” and “white” or “good” and “bad” or “man” and “beast,” knew of the numerous levels and planes at which these terms intersected.
I wondered how he would have reacted if I told him what I believe:
That more meaningful ways of learning and growing – of guiding humanity towards coexistence and away from discord, of bringing awareness to the consequences of silence and to the importance of kindness, and of teaching the individual how to live, love, consider, cope, ponder, imagine, accept, and tolerate – can be found in the rhythms of a single poetic line, or the obscure tropes of a work of prose, than all his books, mandates, and documents on “law” and “order” can ever give to a civilization of people.
Literature has consequences.
The study of philosophy, religion, history, culture, linguistics, visual and performing arts has consequences.
I won’t feign to possess a profound or universally correct answer to how they induce these changes or effects – but I can offer my own.
Literature is a capsule that contains all possibilities: problems and solutions, life and death, beauty and beast, right and wrong, love and loss. When it is read as something that is legitimate – something that is not devalued because of its aesthetics or subjectivity – it can offer commentary, solace, and answers.
It is able to do so because it allows us to inhabit different worlds, perspectives, and moral codes.
For myself, literature stands foremost as the guardian of diverse viewpoints, as the representative of shades of experiences. In this form, it has given me companionship in times when I believed I was alone in what I felt; it has taught me to understand and give consideration to experiences that are “other” to my own; it reminds me of what is human; it reminds me of what is “not human” – and yet still is.
It has expanded my mind to include other people’s well being in my life’s purpose, and has imbibed my will with a belief in the elusive “good of humanity,” despite contrary efforts to do otherwise. It has crafted an idealist out of this individual, one who is tempered by realism, moved by people’s diversity, and motivated by a desire to help. It has given at least one individual the conviction to believe that a “mere” person has the ability, as well as the responsibility, to make a difference somewhere, for someone.
I say this with emphasis because, as I am this way now, I was not so before.
Literature has consequences.
The study of philosophy, religion, history, culture, linguistics, visual and performing arts has consequences.
It begins with the individual, expanding his or her mind. It ends with the cosmos or society or person, influenced and moved by this other.
Perhaps you are blind to its effects, as – I admit – I am partially blind to the magic that happens in the S.T.E.M., or other academic subjects. This does not mean that it is not there.
As Glyn Maxwell, one of Britain’s great poets point out, to think that there is nothing to learn from long ago, from works that have outrun time immemorial, is solipsistic, reductive – can I add, illogical?
—————————————————————————————————————-
I don’t mean to make assumptions about the alumnus I spoke to. It could have been entirely possible that he wasn’t being dismissive at all; many people who study or major in a liberal arts subject go on to pursue a profession in law. He simply stands in as a symbol of what is often said about the liberal arts and, also, as a way into framing the argument.
I really enjoyed Neil Gaiman’s lecture/speech on why our future depends on libraries, reading, and daydreaming, and you guys should check it out if you’re interested in reading more.